“Why, anybody can have a brain. That's a very mediocre commodity. Every pusillanimous creature that crawls on the Earth or slinks through slimy seas has a brain. Back where I come from, we have universities, seats of great learning, where men go to become great thinkers. And when they come out, they think deep thoughts and with no more brains than you have. But they have one thing you haven't got: a diploma.”

--The Wizard of Oz to the Scarecrow


"I know I chatter on far too much...but if you only knew how many things I want to say and don't. Give me SOME credit." --Anne Shirley, Anne of Green Gables, PBS, 1985

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

My Grown Up Christmas List

About a week my husband’s cousin had a Facebook status that I really liked. It went like this:

Every Christmas you always hear people saying they want and bought. Well this is what I want: I want people who are sick with no cure, to be cured. I want children with no families, to be adopted; I want people to never have to worry about food and shelter & heat. Now, lets see how many people re-post this who actually care.... I have a feeling I am gonna see almost no re-posts. Then again I have faith in people…

I’m not sure the post originated with her, but I wouldn’t be surprised—she has that kind of heart. The statement reminded me of one of my favorite secular Christmas songs. My favorite artist is Amy Grant, but it has been repeated by Kelly Clarkson, Michael Buble, Monica, and even Aretha Franklin recorded it in 2007 on her This Christmas album. It’s called “My Grown Up Christmas List,” and here are the lyrics:

Do you remember me
I sat upon your knee
I wrote to you with childhood fantasies
Well I'm all grown up now
And still need help somehow
I'm not a child
But my heart still can dream

So here's my lifelong wish
My grown up Christmas list
Not for myself
But for a world in need

No more lives torn apart
That wars would never start
And time would heal all hearts
And everyone would have a friend
And right would always win
And love would never end ooh
This is my grown up Christmas list

As children we believe
The grandest sight to see
Was something lovely
Wrapped beneath the tree
But heaven only knows
That packages and bows
Can never heal a heartached human soul

No more lives torn apart
That wars would never start
And time would heal all hearts
And everyone would have a friend
And right would always win
And love would never end no
This is my grown up Christmas list

What is this illusion called the innocence of youth
Maybe only in our blind belief can we ever find the truth

No more lives torn apart
That wars would never start
And time would heal all hearts
Everyone would have a friend
And right would always win
And love would never end

This is my grown up Christmas list
This is my only lifelong wish
This is my grown up Christmas list...

I guess I’m just hoping that people who are grown up now realize that they aren’t sitting on Santa’s knee wishing for things anymore. They are grown up, responsible citizens, responsible to God, living in His kingdom, and part of His redemption plan. It’s our responsibility as His children to bring help, healing, truth and love to the world. Johnny’s cousin, Laura, is certainly doing her part in the arena of the hurting, those who need help transitioning into society from life's hard situations. May we all open our eyes more to the needs around us. There are many.



Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Let us do evil that good may come

What is the Christian ethic regarding the income tax?

How can God's command to not steal be broken and yet many Christians applaud it as a good thing if accomplished by majority vote?

If you say that it is done for a good cause, how do you escape the rationale in my title?

The scripture nowhere endorses this scheme. In both Old and New Testaments charitable giving is to be done willingly.

This kind of giving puts a sword into the hand of the state that robs Christ of His glory and the church of her witness, therefore I say that Christians are presently obligated to pay the income tax. The fact that it is unrighteous is no excuse to not pay, as Christ taught Peter regarding the temple tax. We should at the same time seek it's demise, by voting, speaking, and writing as we have opportunity.

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Who Owns Us?

Moral or Immoral Government
by Walter E. Williams

Immorality in government lies at the heart of our nation's problems. Deficits, debt and runaway government are merely symptoms. What's moral and immoral conduct can be complicated, but needlessly so. I keep things simple and you tell me where I go wrong.
My initial assumption is that we each own ourselves. I am my private property and you are yours. If we accept the notion that people own themselves, then it's easy to discover what forms of conduct are moral and immoral. Immoral acts are those that violate self-ownership. Murder, rape, assault and slavery are immoral because those acts violate private property. So is theft, broadly defined as taking the rightful property of one person and giving it to another.
If it is your belief that people do not belong to themselves, they are in whole or in part the property of the U.S. Congress, or people are owned by God, who has placed the U.S. Congress in charge of managing them, then all of my observations are simply nonsense.
Let's look at some congressional actions in light of self-ownership. Do farmers and businessmen have a right to congressional handouts? Does a person have a right to congressional handouts for housing, food and medical care?
First, let's ask: Where does Congress get handout money? One thing for sure, it's not from the Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus nor is it congressmen reaching into their own pockets. The only way for Congress to give one American one dollar is to first, through the tax code, take that dollar from some other American. It must forcibly use one American to serve another American. Forcibly using one person to serve another is one way to describe slavery. As such, it violates self-ownership.
Government immorality isn't restricted only to forcing one person to serve another. Some regulations such as forcing motorists to wear seatbelts violate self-ownership. If one owns himself, he has the right to take chances with his own life. Some people argue that if you're not wearing a seatbelt, have an accident and become a vegetable, you'll become a burden on society. That's not a problem of liberty and self-ownership. It's a problem of socialism where through the tax code one person is forcibly used to care for another.
These examples are among thousands of government actions that violate the principles of self-ownership. Some might argue that Congress forcing us to help one another and forcing us to take care of ourselves are good ideas. But my question to you is: When congressmen and presidents take their oaths of office, is that oath to uphold and defend good ideas or the U.S. Constitution?
When the principles of self-ownership are taken into account, two-thirds to three-quarters of what Congress does violate those principles to one degree or another as well as the Constitution to which they've sworn to uphold and defend. In 1794, when Congress appropriated $15,000 to assist some French refugees, James Madison, the father of our Constitution, stood on the floor of the House to object, saying, "I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents." Did James Madison miss something in the Constitution?
You might answer, "He forgot the general welfare clause." No, he had that covered, saying, "If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one."

If we accept the value of self-ownership, it is clear that most of what Congress does is clearly immoral. If this is bothersome, there are two ways around my argument. The first is to deny the implications of self-ownership. The second is to ask, as Speaker Nancy Pelosi did when asked about the constitutionality of Obamacare, "Are you serious? Are you serious?"
December 7, 2010
Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin distinguished professor of economics at George Mason University, and a nationally syndicated columnist. 

Copyright © 2010 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Courtesy of Lew Rockwell